Erik

First Oak Grove (pre-election), then Ramsey (post-election) terminate their contracts. Prior to election, after Oak Grove decision, county attorney threatened with felonies any poll worker not using the electronic poll pads. That was 2024... let's see what 2025 brings. With more freedom-loving people in city councils and town boards, a bigger swell of support for people-owned elections may lead to additional votes and decisions to bring the many outsourced parts of the decision-making process now called 'elections' back to the people as part of a restored constitutional republic.

It helps to reflect/feel at least one day per week, instead of only being active and taking actions.

A few years ago I noticed elections are probably not what they seem. Many have noticed this, particularly with electronics entering and now dominating the process, defended by the legal apparatus. But when reviewing JFK files (the 2023 version is here: https://jfkfiles.projectapario.com ), I found election-related pages. Like "Perhaps they will switch out voting machines" or "they won the $20,000,000 voting machine contract". These gave me context and allowed me to think bigger. Controlling elections lets decision makers be controlled. What other seeds of truth can be found in past declassified records, or in recent FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) documents? Maybe we should find out?